Power and History

In discussions over the so-called Deuteronomic History, many recent scholars have put forth arguments claiming that the entire history of Israel was constructed at a time during the later monarchy in the southern kingdom (perhaps by Hezekiah or Josiah). Therefore, all of this history is filtered through the lens of a 6th-8th century Judean perspective. In these theories, the last one standing got to write and edit history. However, even if we point out weaknesses in this reductionistic approach to OT history, we cannot escape the fact that someone authored and edited these works commonly known as "histories."

Furthermore, in the ancient world, "history" was not seen as something to be "objective." Rather, one told "history" through one's unique lens and theology. There was no problem with mixing theological biases and historical claims.

However, as we think about today, we are really not all that different. We all filter our own history through our particular biases and beliefs. For example, our position as American citizens will naturally color how we approach history that involves the United States. Similarly, for those who are Christians, we will probably approach church history in a different manner than non-Christians.

Finally, even if we do not accept reductionistic claims about Israel's history-writing, we can at least accept their argument that the one with power, or the last one standing, has a significant impact on how the story is told. With that in mind, we need to be aware of ways in which we stand in positions of power. If it is true that such positions also carry with them the ability to shape the story of history, then we must act with great care and responsibility to ensure that our biases do not color our take on history in a way that is unrealistic or even harmful.